Walter Benjamin the work of art in mechanical reproduction
Documentary photographers like Walker Evans, Arthur
Rothsteine, Dorothea Lange, were initially to show ‘city folk’ what life was
really like in the countryside. They photographed the Great Depression in the
1920s and 30’s and are some of the only sources of TRUE evidence. Untampered
with as shot on film, un-edited and un-art directed. Very different than how
Vogue portrayed America during this time period, however the purpose and
distribution is vastly different. Magazines provided a sense of escapism. The
average American would not be living a life with excess or luxurious settings
(with designer garments), so a magazine showing them what they could already
see would not sell. Money would only be spend on something to take them away
from this reality or provide them with additional knowledge (like a fiction/
non-fiction book would). Never the less, Magazines were not targeted at people
living the kind of lives documented by the FSA photographers- they were
targeted at city folk as this is where the ‘culture lived’, and these
photographs (despite documenting the truth) represented a piece of
entertainment/dystopian-ism, as for the city folk, the way these people were
living must have been unimaginable but still fascinating. (This also starts
raising issues in class divide within the publishing industry.) In conclusion,
DOCUMENTARY IMAGES are for NEWSPAPERS and stories about NON-FICTION. Fashion
editorials take an opposite approach, perhaps loosely based on truths yet not
conducted in such a head on way- artistic concept, allure and imagination are
all combined to create something not found in the public media spectrum
(especially Vogue 1930s onwards).
No comments:
Post a Comment